Has the Treaty of Union 1707 been replaced?

    As you know I have pointed out for quite some time that the English Act of Union Bill (2017-2019) was being enacted in all but name. Now it has replaced the original English Act of Union!

During indyref the English establishment promoted the paper they commissioned Crawford and Boyle to pen stating that Scotland was extinguished and subsumed into a Greater England albeit under the new name of "UK". They then on 19 September 2014 drew up EVEL and had that enacted creating, in breach of the treaty, in essence an English parliament within the parliament of GB. Then they sought an exit from the EU.

During that time though they drew up the English Act of Union (2017-2019) Bill. Facing opposition they let it sit and instead tried to write into law English parliamentary sovereignty via Clause 38. The building blocks were being put in place - the parliament and sovereignty. They then changed how Scots are identified internationally along with the name of the state by classing Scots as English subjects via travel requirements for motorists and changing Great Britain to United Kingdom. It should be pointed out that they also removed Scots nationality and replaced it with British and had all legal identifiers changed to UK and British. They even set up an English governmental office in the capital of Scotland and in Glasgow. They then had the English supreme court judgement claim that English (UK) law was in essence supreme. Bear in mind that they have enacted law that means the English government supercede the English courts!

All of which is in violation of the treaty of 1707 and fundamentally alters the very nature of the treaty.

The next thing to be changed by the English government is the Human Rights Act which the English government are replacing with an English Human Rights Bill (soon to be Act).

While all this has been enacted and in the case of human rights is being drawn up and legislated for, Scotland has been crying "now is not the time". When is the time? When the English Human Rights Act is enacted as well? After that? In how many months, years? Scotland is actively being extinguished and the Scottish government and Scots representatives remain silent. If Scotland does not stand up NOW it will be too late. It already is in many ways.

Here are a few links. note the terminology used. The wording in particular to the English Act of Union Bill especially part 1 section 1 and the IM Act.

https://www.gov.uk/displayi.../flags-symbols-and-identifiers - note "If you have a GB sticker, cover or remove it before driving outside the UK.",
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNawcGqBWc4&t=2s clause 38 English parliamentary sovereignty
By Carwyn Jones Clause 38 They are trying to enforce English law on Scotland & take away our rights.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In What Way Is Scotland Subjugated?

 This is a question I am often asked. The automatic response is, in which way isn't Scotland subjugated? But that makes the assumption that folk know what subjugation is. So what is subjugation? To Subjugate: to bring under control and governance as a  subject   :  CONQUER to make submissive  :  SUBDUE So which does Scotland fall under?  Well, it was never conquered. Garrisons were set up across Scotland in order to stop the Scottish civil wars at the bequest of the Scottish government and it had then as it does now its version of the Ross's, Davidson's, Blair's and Brown's. Scots who sought to endear themselves to their English counterparts by treating Scotland with utter disdain. Greed, corruption and a desire for power whether imagined or otherwise were their companions even to the detriment of the Scots who would have, given the chance, given them the Wallace treatment.  The Scots then, as now, were not subjects. They were not below the monarch. They granted lim
Read more

Through The Eyes Of The English Establishment - The Treaty of Union

 The Scots complain A LOT. How dare the English establishment mock our representatives they cry. Only they don't say English. Oh no, that would be to admit the truth that they try so hard to hide from themselves. What they say instead is Westminster and UK. It is the UK Government. The UK Supreme Court, UK law, "unwritten" constitution of UK, reserved to Westminster and yet they will call it an English parliament with a majority of English MPs. They even refer to parliamentary sovereignty and rules of parliament. Neither of which are applicable to the state parliament as they were from the English parliament prior to its abolition. So how do the English establishment see it? Let's look through their eyes. Ever since the Scottish civil wars of the 17th and 18th centuries the Scottish government has sought help from their treaty partner in curbing the unruly Scots and bringing them to heel. So much so that English garrisons were set up all over Scotland and all things S
Read more

Office of Prime Minister - A Very English Government Position

Up until the 1600s England had a chief administrator answerable to the monarch but as the role of chief administrator began to grow with more responsibility being devolved and political change started to take hold the claim of  monarchical absolutism was challenged. It wasn't until the 1600s when the English monarch effectively abandoned the throne and was officially removed by parliament through a parliamentary convention and the new monarch, by dint of birth, was contested that the rise of English parliamentary sovereignty began to take hold. It was during this time that the English political parties began to emerge first as factions and then as the political parties that would stand in parliament. The Whigs, who were against monarchical absolutism due to their religious beliefs, were founded in 1678.  In 1859 the party dissolved and merged with the English Liberal Party. The Whigs opposition was the Tory Party which was founded in 1679. The Tories supported the monarchy and obje
Read more